Obama Judge Limits Use Of Riot Control Tools In Anti-ICE Protests
Judge Sara Ellis, an Obama appointee to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting agents from dispersing crowds in public areas unless there are “exigent circumstances.”
The order forbids the use of crowd control munitions — including tear gas, flash-bang grenades, and less-lethal shotguns — unless officers determine there is an immediate threat to someone’s physical safety. Ellis also ordered officers to issue at least two verbal warnings before deploying such tactics and to give protesters enough time to comply.
The judge went further, forbidding officers from shoving or tackling demonstrators to the ground unless they pose an immediate threat of physical harm or officers are making a lawful arrest.
The case was filed by journalists who said they were manhandled by federal officers during protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in the Chicago area.
Justice Department lawyers objected to the judge’s ruling, arguing that federal officers must have discretion to make split-second decisions in volatile situations.
The decision came the same week another judge appointed by President Joe Biden temporarily blocked President Donald Trump from sending the National Guard to Chicago to protect federal facilities from violent protesters.
U.S. District Judge April Perry issued an order halting Trump’s plan to deploy troops to secure Immigration and Customs Enforcement buildings in Chicago, pending a second hearing scheduled for Friday, according to The Hill.
The ruling followed a lawsuit filed by Illinois and Chicago officials seeking to block Trump’s use of the National Guard to protect federal officers. The lawsuit came after weeks of escalating unrest outside ICE facilities, Breitbart News reported.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker, a Democrat, has faced criticism for encouraging protests and using incendiary language against Republicans and federal authorities.
In remarks to Democrat activists earlier this year, Pritzker said, “Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption. But I am now. These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.”
Pritzker has called Trump’s enforcement of federal immigration law an “unconstitutional invasion of Illinois by the federal government.”
“Donald Trump is not a king — and his administration is not above the law,” Pritzker said Thursday on X. “Today, the court confirmed what we all know: there is no credible evidence of a rebellion in the state of Illinois. And no place for the National Guard in the streets of American cities like Chicago.”
Trump adviser Stephen Miller blasted Pritzker’s interference with federal law enforcement, accusing the governor of encouraging violence by opposing ICE operations.
“Pritzker is saying that if ICE officers are performing their duties in Chicago it is an incitement to violence against them,” Miller wrote Thursday on X. “What is the correct term to describe this?”
Pritzker is saying that if ICE officers are performing their duties in Chicago it is an incitement to violence against them. What is the correct term to describe this? https://t.co/8so0dJmZZt
— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) October 10, 2025
Miller also criticized Judge Perry’s ruling, writing, “Federal judge: protecting ICE officers from violent attack will only further motivate the violent attackers.”
Meanwhile, Illinois State Police officers appeared outside the ICE facility in Broadview on Friday, where they arrested violent protesters who attempted to break through a police line protecting federal property.
Gavin Newsom Gets Owned By Fraud Exposer Nick Shirley After He Mocked Him

You might recall Nick Shirley, the courageous young investigative journalist who uncovered the fraud at the Minneapolis Quality “Learing” Center, revealing significant misconduct in Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s administration. His findings didn’t just gain traction online; they triggered serious repercussions: a federal investigation, a suspension of childcare payments, and Shirley’s testimony before Congress.
Less than a day after a heated exchange between Shirley and Walz on social media, the beleaguered governor shocked many by announcing he wouldn’t seek reelection. “I ENDED TIM WALZ,” Shirley proclaimed on X in early January.
Next, he turned his attention to California, and on Wednesday, he dropped a 40-minute video detailing his investigations thus far:
Here is the full 40 minutes of my crew and I exposing California fraud, Minnesota was big but California is even bigger… We uncovered over $170,000,000 in fraud as these fraudsters live in luxury with no consequences. Like it and share it, the fraud must STOP. We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening. These fraudsters have been able to defraud American taxpayers for years without any pushback from the public and politicians. It is time to EXPOSE IT ALL and end America’s fraud crisis.
In the post, he claims to have uncovered $170 million in fraud, waste, and abuse in California. Such audacity, of course, made the never-present governor, Gavin Newsom, BIG mad:
Yeah, what a hoot. This fool’s state is crumbling, people and businesses are scrambling to get out, there have been frequent claims of fraud under his and the Democrat supermajority’s ‘leadership,’ and this is what goes on the governor’s official X account? Mocking a fellow American for doing legitimate investigative reporting and highlighting an issue that you and your agencies should have found long ago?
Beyond pathetic.
Shirley quickly showed, however, who the real adult is in the room with an excellent response:
You do realize I’m trying to help America eliminate fraud and waste right? No need to try and make me look like the bad guy for exposing fraud. People are over it. Start working for the people and not against them.
Others let Newscum have it too.
Others praised Shirley, including actor James Woods:
Newsom continues to be a disgusting loser for his state and, really, the entire country. It’s sad to think he has a real shot at winning the Democrat Party’s 2028 nomination.
The courtroom was suffocatingly still. It was the kind of silence that usually precedes a life-altering sentence
The courtroom was suffocatingly still. It was the kind of silence that usually precedes a life-altering sentence. In the center of it all sat Clara, the “grieving widow” of billionaire industrialist Arthur Sterling. She looked like a portrait of refined sorrow—dressed in tasteful charcoal silk, dabbing at her eyes with a lace handkerchief, the picture of a woman wronged by the woman who had allegedly poisoned her husband.
Across the room sat Mrs. Gable, the nanny who had been my shadow, my protector, and my only source of warmth since I was an infant. She looked fragile, her hands clasped tightly in her lap, resigned to a future behind cold, grey walls. The prosecutor was finishing his closing statement, painting Mrs. Gable as a cold-hearted opportunist who had laced Arthur’s bedtime tea with digitalis.

The judge was preparing to call for the verdict. I was eight years old, sitting in the back row between a court-appointed guardian and the cold, unfeeling air of a life that was about to be dismantled.
I didn’t think about the guards, the bailiffs, or the judge’s gavel. I thought about the way Mrs. Gable used to read to me until my eyelids grew heavy. I thought about the time she took the blame for a broken vase so I wouldn’t have to face Arthur’s temper. I looked at Clara, my “stepmother,” sitting so gracefully, and I saw the way her hand reached out to squeeze Julian—Arthur’s business partner and her “cousin”—a little too warmly.
I slipped out of my seat. I was wearing my pajamas because they had taken me from my bed that morning, and I had forgotten my shoes. My feet hit the cold, hard marble of the courtroom floor, the sound of my small, frantic footsteps echoing like gunshots in the sudden quiet.
“Stop!” I screamed, my voice cracking with the terror of a child who had seen a ghost. “My nanny didn’t kill my father!”
The courtroom erupted. Guards surged forward, but I was fast. I skidded to a halt in front of the judge’s bench, holding up my most prized possession: a bright, plastic, pink toy phone. To everyone else, it was a piece of junk. To me, it was the weapon that would set the world right.
“It’s not just a toy,” I sobbed, looking up at the judge. “Mrs. Gable is nice. She was crying because Arthur was mean. But Clara… Clara was the one who made the tea.”
The judge looked at the prosecutor, then at me. His face softened with a weary, profound sadness. “Sweetheart, what are you doing here?”
“I heard them,” I whispered. “That night, I was hiding in the pantry because Arthur was yelling. I had my phone. I didn’t know how to call the police, but I knew how to record.”
The courtroom was paralyzed. Even Clara had stopped dabbing her eyes. She stared at me, her face pale, her lips parted in a silent plea for me to be quiet.

I pressed the button on the plastic toy. It wasn’t a real phone; it was a cheap voice recorder I had hidden inside the casing after Mrs. Gable showed me how to use the ‘record’ function on Arthur’s actual phone one day. The room filled with the scratchy, undeniable sound of Clara’s voice.
“He’s finally going to sleep, Julian,” the recording said, the voice crisp and chilling. “Once the digitalis kicks in, the board will have no choice but to name you CEO. We’ll finally have what he stole from us.”
The silence that followed was absolute. Mrs. Gable began to weep, not for herself, but for me. Clara stood up, her hand flying to her throat, her mask of sorrow utterly shattered. She looked at the jury, then at the exits, realizing the walls she had spent years building were crumbling in seconds.
But the real shock—the twist that no one in that courtroom was prepared for—wasn’t the arrest of Clara and Julian. It was the discovery that followed.
As the police hauled them away, a detective approached me. “Sweetheart, how did you know how to do this?”
“Mrs. Gable told me,” I said, still trembling. “She said that when the world is full of secrets, the truth is the only thing that doesn’t cost anything.”
The detectives searched Clara’s private vault, expecting to find the missing millions. They found them, yes, but they also found Arthur’s real will. It wasn’t the one Clara had presented to the court. It was a document written in Arthur’s own hand, dated the day before he died. He had known. He had suspected Clara and Julian were plotting against him, and he had set a trap.
He had transferred the vast majority of his wealth into a trust for me, with Mrs. Gable as the sole executor. He hadn’t just suspected them; he had been waiting for them to move, knowing the only person they would never suspect of seeing their sins was an eight-year-old girl.
I didn’t go to an orphanage. I didn’t go to live with distant relatives. I went home with Mrs. Gable.
The house was empty of the cold, aristocratic people who had made my life a prison. We opened the windows, let the sunlight flood in, and for the first time, the house smelled like fresh tea and laughter instead of greed.
Years later, I’m sitting in that same dining room, looking at the plastic pink phone sitting in a glass display case on the mantle. People ask me if I’m angry about the childhood I lost. I tell them no. Because that day in court, I didn’t just save a nanny—I saved myself. I learned that you don’t have to be a billionaire, or a widow, or an adult to change the course of history. You just have to be the person who remembers to listen when everyone else is busy talking. I was just a girl in pajamas, but I was the only person in that room who held the truth, and that made me more powerful than anyone else in the world.
The acquittal of Mrs. Gable was not just a victory; it was an earthquake. The trial of Clara and Julian became the most-watched event of the decade, but as the dust settled, the true depth of their cruelty began to surface in the form of letters, documents, and buried secrets.
However, the real drama began three months later, when I was sitting in the library of what was now my house—the very place where I had lived as a prisoner. I was going through my father Arthur’s old files, looking for nothing in particular, when I found a false back in his desk drawer.
It contained a single manila envelope addressed to me, but not for me to open until my eighteenth birthday. I was ten now. I opened it anyway.
Inside were medical records. Not mine, but Clara’s. They were from a facility in Switzerland, dated five years before she ever met my father. They detailed a history of psychiatric instability and, more importantly, a connection I hadn’t expected: Clara and Julian weren’t cousins. They were partners in a long-con operation that had left a trail of three “deceased” husbands across Europe.
My father hadn’t just been a target; he had been their fourth mark. And I was the only witness who had survived.
I brought the documents to the lead detective, a man named Miller who had become a guardian of sorts. When he read them, his face went as white as the court marble. “This changes everything, Clara. They weren’t just after the Sterling fortune. They were a professional syndicate. And the reason they didn’t kill you that night? They were keeping you as a ‘living insurance policy’ in case the will contest failed.”
But the twist that shattered my world wasn’t the realization that my mother-figure, Mrs. Gable, was in danger—it was the moment I realized Mrs. Gable knew.
I confronted her that evening in the kitchen. The air was thick with the scent of lavender and the tea I had come to love. I showed her the file. She didn’t look surprised. She looked tired.
“I knew, darling,” she said, her voice soft. “I knew who they were the day Clara walked into this house. I was Arthur’s private investigator, hired by him to watch them. I took the job as your nanny to be your shield.”
My breath hitched. “You… you were a spy?”
“I was a woman who lost her own child to people like them,” she whispered. “When I saw you, I didn’t see an employer’s daughter. I saw a chance to save one soul from the fire.”
I felt the ground shift under my feet. Everything I had been told about my “loyal” nanny was a carefully constructed fiction designed to keep me safe. But then, she pulled a small, silver key from her apron pocket—a key that looked identical to the one my grandmother had given me in my dream.
“There is one last secret, Clara,” she said. “Your father, Arthur, wasn’t the man who built the Sterling empire. He was the man who inherited it from the people Clara and Julian were originally working for. The Syndicate. And you aren’t just the heir to his money—you are the only person who holds the biological key to the offshore encryption that holds their entire organization together.”
I realized then why I had been watched so closely. My father had encoded the access to the Syndicate’s digital treasury into my very DNA—a biometric security feature that only I could unlock. I wasn’t just a girl in pajamas; I was a living, breathing vault.
The final drama erupted at my tenth birthday party, which I decided to hold at the estate—a trap I had spent weeks setting.
The Syndicate arrived in the form of lawyers, masquerading as court officials, trying to claim “guardianship” of me. They thought I was a naive child who would be easily intimidated. They didn’t know that Mrs. Gable had trained me for this.
As they approached me in the grand ballroom, I didn’t run. I sat at my father’s desk, placed my hand on the biometric scanner they had brought, and instead of unlocking the vault, I activated the “Scorched Earth” protocol Mrs. Gable had taught me.
The screens in the room flickered to life, projecting the faces of every Syndicate member, every corrupted judge, and every politician involved in the scheme onto the walls. The “vault” wasn’t a bank account—it was a real-time broadcast to the International Interpol database.
Their expressions went from predatory to pure, unadulterated horror as the sound of sirens—hundreds of them—began to wail in the distance