Missouri Sues To End Counting Of Illegal Aliens In Census, Wants Recount
Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway announced Friday that the state, along with several individual plaintiffs, has filed suit against the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Census Bureau seeking to end the counting of illegal aliens in the census and force a recount of the 2020 Census and 2021 congressional apportionment.
In a press release, Hanaway described the lawsuit as a major constitutional challenge to how federal representation is calculated.
“To defend our fundamental right to representation in government, Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway filed the most significant election lawsuit in a generation,” the release
stated. “This first-in-the-nation suit was filed against the United States Department of Commerce and the Census Bureau for unconstitutionally allowing illegal aliens to commandeer the path to the White House and compromise our elections.”
“The State of Missouri and its voters can no longer ignore the ongoing denial of their right to self-government and fair representation,” Hanaway said. “United States citizens and lawful permanent residents have a right to representation, unlike illegal aliens and temporary visa holders. In America, the People, the members of the social compact, are the only legitimate source of the government’s power. We are taking a stand against those who are cheating our system.”
The lawsuit argues that the current policy of counting illegal aliens in census tabulations is unlawful and unconstitutional. Hanaway is asking the court to order a recount of the 2020 Census and prohibit the inclusion of illegal aliens in future census apportionments.
The 96-page complaint names the U.S. Department of Commerce, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, the U.S. Census Bureau, and Acting Census Bureau Director George Cook as defendants.
According to the complaint, federal representation is being shifted away from states that enforce immigration laws and toward sanctuary states.
“Attorney General Hanaway will not allow open border states like California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Maryland to steal an estimated 11 congressional seats, 11 electoral votes, and billions of dollars in funding,” the release said.
The lawsuit argues that the policy of counting illegal aliens in the census dates back to a unilateral decision by the Carter administration prior to the 1980 Census.
Hanaway’s office said the framers of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment never intended for illegal aliens or temporary visa holders to be counted for congressional representation.
“They could never have imagined an absurd system where millions of illegal alien trespassers would receive representation in Congress and the Electoral College,” the release stated.
The filing also points to actions taken during the Trump administration.
In July 2020, Donald Trump issued a memorandum directing the Secretary of Commerce to exclude illegal aliens from the apportionment base, even though they were still counted in the raw census data.
California and New York immediately challenged the order in court.
While the Supreme Court ultimately vacated the injunctions blocking Trump’s policy, the resulting delays allowed the Biden administration to reverse course and include illegal aliens in the 2021 apportionment.
The lawsuit argues that if Trump’s policy had been implemented, Missouri would have gained an additional congressional seat and an extra vote in the Electoral College.
“Instead, the Biden administration hijacked the representation of Missourians by reversing the Trump administration’s action,” the filing states.
Because the lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of congressional apportionment, it is expected to be heard by a three-judge panel under federal law.
The complaint asks the court to declare that including illegal aliens and temporary visa holders in the 2020 Census and 2021 apportionment violated the Fourteenth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act.
It also seeks an order requiring the Census Bureau to redo the 2020 Census and 2021 apportionment, remove illegal aliens and temporary visa holders from future apportionment bases, and prohibit their inclusion in the 2030 Census and 2031 apportionment.
Trump Air Force One Fall Claims Unverified 1
Unverified Claims About Donald Trump and Air Force One Incident Spark Online Frenzy
Washington, D.C. — A wave of online speculation erupted this week following unverified claims that former President Donald Trump experienced a fall while aboard Air Force One. The reports, which began circulating on social media platforms late Tuesday evening, quickly gained traction despite the absence of any confirmed evidence or official statements.
The rumors describe an alleged incident occurring mid-flight, with some posts suggesting Trump stumbled while moving through the aircraft cabin. However, no credible sources—including major news outlets, official spokespeople, or verified eyewitness accounts—have substantiated these claims.
As the story spread, it highlighted a growing trend in digital media: the rapid amplification of unverified information. Within hours, hashtags referencing the alleged fall began trending, with users debating the authenticity of the claims and sharing speculative commentary. Some posts even included fabricated details, further muddying the waters.
Experts in media literacy warn that such situations underscore the importance of verifying information before sharing it. “In today’s information environment, speed often outweighs accuracy,” said one communications analyst. “When a high-profile figure like Donald Trump is involved, even the slightest rumor can escalate into a national conversation almost instantly.”
Despite the viral attention, representatives connected to Trump have not issued any statements confirming or denying the incident. Similarly, there have been no reports of medical evaluations or disruptions tied to the former president’s recent travel schedule.
Aviation experts also note that Air Force One, the highly secure aircraft used for presidential transport, is staffed with medical personnel and equipped to handle emergencies. Any significant incident aboard the plane would typically involve documented procedures and likely generate official communication.
For now, the story remains firmly in the realm of speculation. Observers are urging the public to approach such claims with caution and to rely on verified reporting from reputable sources.As the digital landscape continues to blur the line between fact and rumor, this episode serves as another reminder of how quickly narratives can form—and how important it is to separate confirmed information from unverified claims.
President Trump has to stop live speech as he rushed from podium after ‘medical emergency’ ak
President Trump Abruptly Ends Live Speech After Reported Medical Situation
A routine public address took an unexpected turn when Donald Trump cut his speech short and stepped away from the podium following what aides later described as a medical situation nearby.
According to people in the room, the interruption came mid-remarks. Trump paused, looked toward the side of the stage, and then moved quickly away as staff approached. Members of the press were ushered out while security and medical personnel responded. The exact nature of the incident was not immediately clear, and officials did not confirm who required assistance.
Witnesses described a brief period of confusion as organizers cleared the area. Within minutes, the venue was secured and the event was halted. Video clips circulating online show Trump departing the podium while staff coordinate off-camera, though they offer limited context about what prompted the response.
A spokesperson later said the decision to end the speech was made “out of an abundance of caution” while medical teams attended to the situation. No further details were provided at the time, and there has been no official update on the condition of the individual involved.
Events involving high-profile figures often operate under tight security protocols, meaning even minor disruptions can trigger a swift and highly controlled response. In such settings, it’s not uncommon for organizers to clear the room and limit information until facts are verified.
The moment quickly drew attention across social media, with viewers speculating about what might have happened. However, without confirmed information, much of the online discussion remains unverified.
As of now, Trump has not publicly commented on the interruption, and his team has not indicated whether the speech will be rescheduled. Observers say the focus remains on ensuring the well-being of anyone affected by the incident.
Situations like this highlight how quickly live events can change—and how rapidly those moments can spread online, often before full details are available.
OMG A Reflective Moment From Donald Trump in Washington .,ak
OMG: A Reflective Moment From Donald Trump in Washington
Washington doesn’t pause very often—but for a brief moment, it seemed like it did.
In a scene that caught many observers off guard, Donald Trump appeared noticeably quieter than usual during a recent appearance in the nation’s capital. Known for his high-energy presence and rapid-fire remarks, Trump instead took a more measured tone, creating a moment that quickly drew attention both in the room and online.
Witnesses described a shift in atmosphere. Conversations softened, cameras stayed fixed, and for a few seconds, the focus wasn’t on bold statements or sharp exchanges—but on stillness. Trump paused, looked out across the audience, and seemed to take in the moment before continuing. It wasn’t dramatic in the traditional sense, but it stood out precisely because it was so different from expectations.
Clips of the moment spread rapidly across social media, with viewers offering a wide range of interpretations. Some saw it as a rare, reflective pause—an instance of composure amid the usual intensity of political life. Others viewed it as simply a natural break in pacing, something that can happen during any public address. Either way, the reaction underscored how closely every gesture is watched and analyzed.
Political figures often communicate as much through body language as they do through words. A pause, a glance, or a change in tone can carry meaning—real or perceived. In Trump’s case, a figure who has spent years in the public eye, even the smallest departure from his typical style can spark conversation.
There’s also a broader context to consider. Washington has been filled with constant headlines, debates, and fast-moving developments. In that environment, a quiet moment can feel unusually powerful. It gives audiences a chance to project their own interpretations, filling the silence with questions about what it might mean.
As expected, there has been no official explanation for the pause, and none may be needed. Not every moment is a message—sometimes it’s simply a moment. Still, in today’s media landscape, even a few seconds of stillness can become a focal point for discussion.
Whether it was reflection, strategy, or just a natural pause, one thing is clear: it captured attention. And in a city that rarely slows down, that alone is enough to make headlines.
