Devastated. She threatened to primary them, and they didn't care

New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and socialism have taken quite a few hits in the past week. Just before New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani arrived in Washington for his first meeting with President Donald Trump, the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan resolution condemning what it called the “horrors of socialism.”

“A yes vote on this resolution should be a relatively straightforward, easy decision. It simply states that Congress denounces socialism in all its forms and opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States of America,” Republican Arkansas Rep. French Hill said.

The measure passed in a bipartisan vote of 285-98. Among the 86 Democrats who backed it were 14 members from New York and New Jersey, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who endorsed Mamdani only in the final moments of the mayoral race.

Other New Yorkers who supported the resolution included Bronx Rep. Ritchie Torres, Queens Reps. Greg Meeks and Grace Meng, and Long Island Reps. Laura Gillen and Tom Suozzi.

Suozzi made a point of distancing himself from Mamdani throughout the campaign.

The resolution also received support from Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of Staten Island, whose mother fled Cuba in 1959 to escape what she described as “the very things that our new socialist mayor in New York City says he wants.”

Mamdani and AOC have sparked a “socialist movement” that could endanger Democrats going into the 2026 midterms.

“Two more candidates who are proud to align themselves with socialism are running for important House seats in solid blue districts in Democrat-controlled states. The secret sauce fueling this phenomenon is a widely perceived belief among the progressives who dominate the grassroots of the party that the Democratic establishment is corrupt to the core and must not just be reformed but thoroughly eradicated,” wrote Liberty Nation’s Joe Schaeffer.

“In my opinion, the real moment right now in the Democratic Party is, do we want to go back to the politics as usual?” Saikat Chakrabarti told NBC News in an interview for an article that ran Nov. 19, labeling his prospective main political opponent for the position he is eyeing as “part of that normal establishment politics.”

That enemy is none other than California state Senator Scott Wiener, who is one of the most extreme left-wing politicians in the Golden State.

But Wiener is also thought to be connected to the party’s mainstream, which could hurt him a lot more in the Bay Area than his controversial views on how transgender youth “rights” should take precedence over parental authority or how “sex workers” should be free to roam California street corners.

Chakrabarti and Wiener are both running for the Democratic nomination for the seat that Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is leaving open.

Three or four years ago, during the Biden administration’s White House heyday, the political climate may have supported Wiener. But in 2025, the winds of change are obviously flowing in Chakrabarti’s direction.

Chakrabarti helped start the Justice Democrats, a dissident progressive group that became well-known when Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) became a rising star on the left in November 2018.

One of these fellow travelers is Chi Osse, a member of the New York City Council who is running against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) in the primary.

Osse, who is 27 years old, left the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in 2022 because of a disagreement over policy. However, he rejoined the group this past summer.

“Power to the people! But is it really as easy as that? The Democratic establishment hasn’t run the show for decades by dumb luck. It still has potent cards to play. The mystique of incumbency and the assertion that capturing vital offices can be achieved only by supporting the pecking order already locked into place still carry pragmatic pull even among the most inflamed pitchfork-carrying progressives,” wrote Liberty Nation’s Joe Schaeffer.

Democrat Party Weaknesses Revealed Amid Ongoing Govt. Shutdown

WASHINGTON D.C. — A scathing op-ed published in The Hill by conservative analyst Liz Peek highlights a growing "civil war" within the Democratic Party that could derail their prospects for the 2026 midterms. As the government shutdown enters its second month, moderate leadership is increasingly being held hostage by a radicalized progressive wing.

The Schumer vs. AOC Standoff

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is reportedly shifting to a more hardline, obstructionist stance

on the budget to ward off a potential primary challenge from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).

The Numbers: Polling from Data for Progress shows Schumer trailing AOC by a staggering 19 points in a hypothetical primary matchup.

The Shift: Critics point out that Schumer, once an outspoken opponent of government shutdowns, is now leading one to maintain his standing with the "socialist" base of the party.

The Rise of the "Socialist" Candidates

In the country's largest urban centers, far-left candidates are successfully ousting or challenging moderate incumbents:

New York City: Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani is currently leading former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the race for Mayor. Mamdani’s campaign has been fueled by massive donations from progressive billionaires like Elizabeth Simons and Soros-linked groups.
Minneapolis: While socialist Omar Fateh is attempting to unseat Mayor Jacob Frey, he recently suffered a major blow when the Minnesota DFL (Democrat-Farmer-Labor) rescinded their endorsement following fraud allegations.

A Strategic Failure in Swing States

While "defund the police" and "abolish ICE" rhetoric resonates in deep-blue pockets like Brooklyn or Minneapolis, Peek argues it is "poison" in swing states like Pennsylvania and Ohio. With Trump successfully occupying the "all-powerful center," Democrats are perceived as being obsessed with endless spending and open-border policies—positions that are increasingly out of step with the majority of the American electorate.

The House on Thursday failed to adopt a war powers resolution that attempted to curtail President Donald Trump's military actions in Iran.

It failed by a vote of 212-219. Republican Reps. Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson bucked GOP leaders by voting in favor; four Democrats voted against the resolution: Reps. Henry Cuellar, Jared Golden, Greg Landsman and Juan Vargas.

The resolution, which only expresses the sentiment of Congress, called on the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces in hostilities against Iran or any part of the Iranian government or military unless a declaration of war or authorization to use military force is enacted.

The measure was non-binding and not subject to the president's signature or veto.

Speaker Mike Johnson argued Wednesday that the United States is "not at war" but only engaged in a "defensive operation" in Iran.

“We're not at war right now,” Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. “We're in -- four days into a very specific, clear mission and operation."

Later on Wednesday, Trump contradicted Johnson, repeatedly referring to the conflict in Iran as a "war" hours after Johnson said it wasn't.

Sitting next to Johnson during a roundtable on energy prices, Trump said "we're doing very well on -- on the war front, to put it mildly."

A U.S. Army High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) launches from an undisclosed location in support Operation Epic Fury.

US Army

Johnson had said that the "passage of a war powers resolution right now would be a terrible, dangerous idea."

"It would empower our enemies. It would kneecap our own forces, and it would take the ability of the U.S. military and the commander in chief away from completing this critical mission to keep everybody safe," he said Wednesday.

House fails to adopt Iran war powers resolution