Bessent Says Supreme Court Unlikely To Block Trump Tariffs
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said it is “very unlikely” the Supreme Court will overturn President Donald Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs, with a ruling possibly coming as soon as this week.
“I believe that it is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule a president’s signature economic policy,” Bessent said during an appearance on Meet the Press. “They did not overrule Obamacare. I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos.”
Last month, the Supreme Court upheld a key provision of the Affordable Care Act that allows a federal panel to recommend preventive services insurers must cover at no cost to patients.
Bessent’s remarks came one day after Trump announced plans to impose a new round of tariffs on European goods until what he described as “a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”
Trump did not specify which statute he is invoking, though the move mirrors prior “liberation day” tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA.
Trump said tariffs on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland will begin at 10 percent on Feb. 1 and rise to 25 percent on June 1.
He argued that only the United States has the resources and strategic reach to secure the island and counter growing geopolitical threats in the Arctic.
“We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration,” Trump wrote. “Now, after centuries, it is time for Denmark to give back.”
The tariffs will apply not only to Denmark but also to Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, all of which have pledged to deploy military forces to Greenland in support of Danish sovereignty.
Trump said those actions have dangerously escalated tensions.
The Supreme Court is expected to rule before the end of its term on Trump’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs, though a decision could come this week.
The law grants the president broad authority to deploy economic measures in response to what it defines as an “unusual and extraordinary threat.”
The U.S. government in January ran up a smaller deficit than a year earlier, while tariff collections surged, underscoring how pivotal a long-awaited Supreme Court decision could be to federal fiscal health.
The $30 billion in customs duties collected through tariffs for the month brought the total for the fiscal year to date to $124 billion, which is 304% more than the same time last year.
President Trump first put tariffs on all goods and services coming into the U.S. in April 2025. He also put so-called “reciprocal tariffs” on individual countries. Since then, the White House has been talking to its trading partners and backing off on some of the more aggressive claims while still being tough on issues.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments last November that questioned the reasons Trump gave for the tariffs. It was thought that the decision would come in January. The high court hasn’t made a decision yet, and the White House is worried that a bad decision could mean the U.S. has to pay back the duties it has already collected.
The tariffs helped slow down the rate at which the budget deficit was growing.
The Treasury Department said that in the fourth month of the fiscal year, the shortfall was about $95 billion. This was about 26% less than the same time last year.
That brought the federal deficit to $697 billion so far this year, which is 17% less than the same time last year, according to numbers that weren’t adjusted for the calendar. Changes to the calendar brought the deficit cut down to 21%.
The $38.6 trillion U.S. debt is still costing the country money in interest. The net interest paid for the month was $76 billion, which was more than all other expenses except for Medicare, Social Security, and health care. This year, gross interest has reached $426.5 billion, up from $392.2 billion last year.
1 After a weekend with her stepfather, the little girl wept in agony
After a weekend with her stepfather, the little girl wept in agony — and the moment the doctor looked at the ultrasound, they picked up the phone and called the police.
After a weekend with her stepfather, the little girl wept in agony — and the moment the doctor looked at the ultrasound, they picked up the phone and called the police.
The fluorescent lights in Dr. Hannah Miller’s clinic flickered slightly as a frail seven-year-old girl named Emily Carter sat trembling on the examination table. Her mother, Laura, stood nearby, clutching her purse with shaking hands. Emily hadn’t stopped crying since Sunday night — since she returned from her weekend with her stepfather, Mark Benson.
New mother essentials
Dr. Miller had seen bruises before. She’d seen fear before. But what made her skin crawl that morning was the way Emily flinched at every sound — every shadow. “Can you tell me where it hurts, sweetheart?” Hannah asked softly. Emily only whispered, “Inside.”
A few minutes later, the ultrasound probe glided over the child’s small abdomen. The screen lit up in shades of gray — organs, tissue, movement. But then, something stopped Hannah cold. There was internal trauma — serious, deliberate, and impossible to mistake. She froze, the air in the room thick as concrete. Her professional calm wavered just long enough for Laura to notice.
“What is it?” Laura asked, panic seeping into her voice.
Dr. Miller didn’t answer immediately. She turned to her nurse and, in a voice steady but urgent, said, “Call the police. Right now.”
Laura’s face went pale. Emily began to sob harder, clutching the doctor’s sleeve.
That moment shattered every illusion Laura had tried to maintain. For months, she had dismissed Emily’s withdrawn behavior as shyness — her reluctance to go to Mark’s house as childish stubbornness. But now, watching the doctor’s expression, she knew.
By the time the police arrived, Hannah had printed the ultrasound images, signed her medical report, and comforted the girl with quiet, measured words. “You’re safe now, Emily,” she whispered. But she also knew that safety was a fragile promise — one that would have to be fought for in courtrooms and therapy rooms in the months ahead.
Outside, sirens wailed faintly in the distance, growing louder. Inside, a mother wept for the innocence her child had lost — and for the guilt she would never escape.
The nightmare had only just begun.
Detective Alan Rodriguez had seen countless cases of child abuse, but something about Emily’s file made his jaw tighten. The ultrasound images, the bruising patterns, the forensic notes — everything pointed to one horrifying conclusion. This wasn’t neglect. It was systematic violation.
He and his partner, Detective Maria Nguyen, drove to the suburban home of Mark Benson that evening. The house was spotless, the lawn freshly mowed — a picture of normalcy that only deepened Alan’s unease. Mark opened the door with feigned confusion. “Officers? Is something wrong?”
Maria’s tone was clipped. “We need to ask you a few questions about your stepdaughter, Emily Carter.”
Mark’s eyes darted — just for a second. But to trained detectives, that second was everything.
Inside, the conversation turned tense. Mark denied everything, claimed Emily “made up stories,” insisted Laura was “poisoning her mind.” But Alan had already seen too many similar scripts. He asked permission to search the house. When Mark refused, they obtained a warrant. Within hours, the truth began to surface — blood traces, a hidden memory card, and items that would later serve as damning evidence in court.
Meanwhile, Emily stayed at the hospital under protective care. A child psychologist sat with her daily, gently guiding her to speak. One afternoon, Emily whispered the words that broke every heart in the room: “He said if I told anyone, Mom would go away forever.”
That sentence became the turning point. It wasn’t just about justice now — it was about dismantling the fear that had silenced Emily for so long.
When the case went to trial, Dr. Miller testified with calm precision. The forensic experts confirmed her findings. Laura sat behind her daughter every day, hands clasped tight, praying.
Mark Benson’s mask of control cracked on the third day of testimony. When confronted with the recovered evidence, his silence spoke volumes. The verdict came swiftly: guilty on all counts.
As the gavel struck, Laura exhaled for the first time in months. Emily looked up at her mother with eyes still shadowed but no longer empty. Justice couldn’t erase what had happened — but it could begin to heal.
Months later, spring sunlight filtered through the hospital’s rehabilitation wing as Emily traced pictures in her coloring book. Her therapist, Dr. Sarah Lane, sat beside her, encouraging each small step toward recovery.
Emily still had nightmares — flashes of that dark past. But she was learning to draw again, to smile again. Her laughter was fragile, but real.
Laura attended every therapy session. She had moved to a new apartment, changed jobs, and joined a support group for parents of abused children. The guilt didn’t disappear, but it transformed — into fierce determination. She volunteered at a local child protection nonprofit, helping other parents recognize the signs she once ignored.
Dr. Miller visited occasionally. She never forgot that morning, nor the ultrasound that changed everything. “You’re doing amazing, sweetheart,” she told Emily during one visit. “You’re the bravest girl I know.”
Emily beamed — a small, genuine smile that carried more weight than words.
In court, Mark Benson received a lengthy sentence. He would never again walk free. But for Emily, true justice came in quieter moments — in the arms of her mother, in the calm of her drawings, in the soft assurance that monsters could be defeated.
One afternoon, Laura and Emily planted a small cherry tree outside their new home. “This is our fresh start,” Laura said. Emily nodded, burying her tiny hands in the soil.
Years later, that tree would bloom — a living symbol of resilience, of innocence reclaimed.
Dr. Miller, Detective Rodriguez, and countless others who fought for Emily’s safety moved on to new cases, new lives — but they carried her story with them. Because in every hospital, every police station, every courtroom, another child’s voice was waiting to be heard.
And maybe that’s the real message here — that one act of courage, one doctor’s decision to speak up, can change everything.
If this story moved you, share it. Talk about it. Remind others that vigilance saves lives, and silence costs them. Somewhere, a child like Emily is still waiting for someone to notice. Be that someone.
